måndag 11 januari 2010

Vem tror du på, en arab eller en jude? Mera. (copy)

Lägg till ett snett försmädligt leende och kör sedan fram vilka grodor du har lust med. DN lade fram en ren kristallklar lögn om att israeliska stridsvagnar skulle ha gått en bit in i Gaza utan någon anledning alls. Nu har de hittat på en lika löjlig skröna om "ja, några araber sa så och vi hade inte tid att fråga israelerna"...... Det framförs som en av de få utlandsnyheterna DN anser är väsentliga nu när de drar in det mesta av rapporteringen på utlandssidan. De hade kunnat ha EN person som läste Yahoos utlandsrapportering från Mellanöstern på denna länk så hade de inte behövt ägna sig åt rena fria fantasier för att hacka på Israel, vilket tydligen är deras huvudagenda i dessa bistra tider. Dick Haas kommenterar DN-vansinnet från Jerusalem. Vet du överhuvudtaget varför där är arabiska flyktingar i Gaza? En och endast en anledning: FN och PLO ville ha det så!
August 14, 2005 by Alex Safian, PhD
Why Palestinians Still Live in Refugee Camps

• Why do Palestinians in Gaza still live in refugee camps? Did the Israelis force Palestinians to stay in the squalid, overcrowded camps?

Palestinians still live in refugee camps, even when the camps are in Palestinian Authority controlled areas, because the PLO opposes and prevents refugee resettlement. As the PLO slogan goes, A Palestinian refugee never moves out of his camp except to return home (ie, to Israel).

While the PLO has done its best to keep Palestinians in refugee camps, Israel has done its best to move Palestinians out of the camps and into new homes. Israel even started a heavily subsidized “build-your-own-home” program for Palestinian refugees. According to an early description of the program:

Nine new residential schemes have been built so far, housing some ten thousand families that have chosen to vacate the camps. Each family was given a plot of land with full infrastructure...

The new neighborhoods were built on state land within municipal areas near the camps, and each had an electricity network, water and a sanitation system ... a road system, paved sidewalks and developed surroundings. Public buildings were constructed in each neighborhood such as modern schools, health clinics and shopping centers, and land was allocated for mosques.

... As soon as his house is built, the refugee becomes the full property owner, and in due course his property is registered in the Land Register. (Judea, Samaria and the Gaza District, 1967 – 1987; Israel, Ministry of Defense, 1987)

new gaza housing house building in gaza
Sheik Radwan, Gaza: New houses for Palestinian refugees built by Israel. (1977, Moshe Milner) Sheik Radwan, Gaza: Road construction in neighborhood built for Palestinian refugees by Israel (1977, Moshe Milner)

The vacated homes in the refugee camps were taken down with the goal of eventually creating enough open space so that the camps themselves could be rebuilt as further new neighborhoods for the refugees.

It’s not surprising that the PLO vehemently opposed this program – after all, former residents of a refugee camp, now living in a nice home in a new neighborhood, would have a stake in supporting peace and opposing violence, exactly the opposite of the PLO’s strategy.

What is perhaps surprising is that the United Nations also opposed the program, and passed harsh resolutions demanding that Israel remove the Palestinians from their new homes and return them to the squalid camps. For example, UN General Assembly Resolution 31/15 of Nov. 23, 1976:

Calls once more upon Israel:

(a) To take effective steps immediately for the return of the refugees concerned to the camps from which they were removed in the Gaza Strip and to provide adequate shelters for their accommodation;

(b) To desist from further removal of refuges and destruction of their shelters.

Similarly, UNGA Resolution 34/52 of November 23, 1979 declared that:

measures to resettle Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip away from their homes and property from which they were displaced constitute a violation of their inalienable right to return;

1. Calls once more upon Israel to desist from removal and resettlement of Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip and from destruction of their shelters;

Perhaps thanks to this support from the UN, the PLO began threatening to kill any refugee who would move out of the camps. After a few such attacks, the build-your-own-home program died, and that is why there are still Palestinians refugee camps in Gaza.

• How does the UN define just who qualifies as a Palestinian refugee? And are the UN’s figures for the number of Palestinian refugees accurate?

The UN’s figures are notoriously inaccurate, first of all because of the organization’s curious definition of who qualifies to be considered a Palestinian refugee. According to the UNRWA website:

Under UNRWA's operational definition, Palestine refugees are persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. UNRWA's services are available to all those living in its area of operations who meet this definition, who are registered with the Agency and who need assistance. UNRWA's definition of a refugee also covers the descendants of persons who became refugees in 1948. The number of registered Palestine refugees has subsequently grown from 914,000 in 1950 to more than four million in 2002, and continues to rise due to natural population growth. (emphasis added)

There are serious problems with considering descendants of refugees to be refugees themselves. Indeed, if one follows this definition, then the more than 500,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries who came to Israel after 1948 were nonetheless still refugees even after receiving Israeli citizenship, as are all their descendants (since, in these claims, descendants of Palestinian refugees are themselves considered refugees, even if they have acquired citizenship, such as Palestinian refugees in Jordan). That is, there would be in Israel today at least 3 million Jewish refugees from Arab countries.

In addition, the UN definition contradicts international law, under which descendants of refugees are not considered to be refugees. Thus, under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, a refugee is a person who:

owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.

There is no room under this definition for a descendant of a refugee to be considered a refugee. The UN got around this problem by creating a loophole – the usual refugee conventions do not apply to people receiving aid from UNRWA (and only Palestinians receive aid from UNRWA).

• Whatever the definition, are the UN figures for the number of Palestinian refugees accurate?

No, as the UN itself has admitted. For example, in the Report of the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East – 1 July 1997 - 30 June 1998, the UN concedes that:

UNRWA registration figures are based on information voluntarily supplied by refugees primarily for the purpose of obtaining access to Agency services, and hence cannot be considered statistically valid demographic data; the number of registered refugees present in the Agency's area of operations is almost certainly less that the population recorded.

Since the refugee figures are based on “voluntarily supplied” information given for the purpose of obtaining services, such as financial aid and food rations, there is obvious incentive for people to falsely claim to be refugees to get services to which they are not entitled. Especially since, as previously stated, refugees don’t actually have to live in refugee camps.

There is also incentive never to report deaths of people considered to be refugees – since the rations for the deceased would be discontinued.

The results are predictable: sacks of rice and flour with the UNRWA logo are resold everyday by merchants in Arab marketplaces in, for example, Jerusalem and Gaza.

• Do most of Gaza’s residents live in refugee camps?

The short answer is no. Of the 1,275,000 residents of the Gaza Strip, the UN considers 961,645 to be refugees, but of these only 471,555 live in refugee camps. (Refugee figures from UNRWA as of March 31, 2005, Table 1.0 and Table 2.1.)

• Is Gaza “the most densely populated place in the world”?

Again the answer is no – many places in the world, some rich and some desperately poor, are more densely populated than Gaza. To cite just a few examples:

Area Population Density (persons/sq. mile)
Gaza 8666
District of Columbia 9176
Gibraltar 11,990
Singapore 17,751
Hong Kong 17,833
Monaco 41,608
Macau 71,466
Cairo 82,893
Calcutta 108,005
Manila 113,810
(Sources – Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2004-2005, Tables 18 and 1321; Demographia -- Population Density: Selected International Urban Areas and Components )

Israel började alltså bygga byar för flyktingarna där 1977 så de skulle kunna slippa sin flyktingstatus och bli helt vanliga medborgare. FN och PLO blev totalt rasande, FN klättrade på väggarna för att förbjuda otyget och PLO lovade att mörda varenda arab som flyttade ur lägren! Så minns det nästa gång du hör om anledningarna varför de stackars flyktingarna har sånt liv i Gaza - det är enbart för att FN ville det.

Barghouti huh?

Denna massmördare av judar, som har dömts till 5 livstider i finkan, inte alls utan anledning, Som kändis har han sitt kontor i fängelset och många har varit och intervjuat honom - och han har inte ändrat sina åsikter ett dugg sedan han togs fast 2002. Just av denna anledningen är TT eld och lågor att han ska efterträda gubbväldet i toppen av terroristorganisationen Fatah. SvD983 . Att TT och de tidningar som valt att publicera stycket utan kommentarer, anser att en massmördare av judar är lämplig regeringschef för palestinaaraberna - säger liksom allt.

Israel bygger muuuuuuuur mot Afrika (även här)

Tidningarna klagar på att Israel är tvingat att stoppa den enorma floden av i huvudsak muslimska flyktingar från Afrika som satsar livet eftersom de har hört hur mycket bättre livet är i den Judiska Staten. Israel satsar $1.5 miljarder på detta gränsstaket - alla dylika kallas murar i Sverige som bekant. Israel fortsätter ta emot flyktingar från Darfur (hur många tar Sverige emot?) men kan inte ta emot hela Afrika som vill fly de muslimska regimerna! Det stoppar också terrorister, knarksmugglare och slavhandlare. Att vänsterextremistiska "människorättsgrupper" inte tror på regeringens uppgifter är självklart, och lika självkart att TT nogsamt lyssnar på dom. En miljon afrikanska flyktingar är beredda att försöka komma in i Israel - och inte ens Israel klarar av det. SvD879 .

"Gaza fruktar israelisk invasion"

En annan fantastisk DN-titel som tyder på viss desperation. Helt självklart kommer de snart att invaderas eftersom de sänt ungefär en missil per dag sedan krigsslutet för knappt ett år sedan. Hur måste man tolka det? Att DN säger att självklart ska terrororganisationen Hamas, med starka band till al Qaida, eftersom bägge har det Muslimska Brödraskapet som botten, få göra exakt vad de vill eftersom de är demokratiskt valda av folket i Gaza på att ha stadgar som i huvudsak talar om Folkmord av alla judar. DN förespråkar alltså dessa terroristaktioner helt öppet och anser att judarna borde tåla det. Nästa gång Hamas tvingar fram ett krig, inte alltför långt i framtiden, har vi inte Olmert vid makten, och Israel har sett att det enda vettiga är att permanent ockupera Philadelphikorridoren tills Gazanerna börjar arbeta i stället för att leva på gåvor- fullt tillåtet enligt Osloavtalet. De kommer alltså att bli tvingade tillbaka till det tilstånd 2005 då alla judar hade lämnat Gaza, givit araberna där mer än 3000 toppmoderna mycket lönande växthus, löften om flygplats och stor hamn, de har gasfyndigheter utanför kusten värt $4 miljarder eller mer, som kan börja exploateras den dag terrorismen har avslutats. Läs vidare här.

Och tillbaka i kära Sverige.

Som du har hört har Lennart Eriksson återfått jobbet på Migrationsverket som de satsade en miljon eller mer på att olagligt slippa. Hans tidigare chef, Eugène Palmér, förklarade det ytterligt tydligt om du läser den artikeln i slutet, och vilket Migrationsverket satsade miljoner av våra skattepengar på: "en chef i Sverige får inte ha fel åsikter!" Föredrar man demokrati mot diktatur må det ej sägas! Läs vidare på Lennarts blogg . TT...

Inga kommentarer :

Skicka en kommentar

Tack för kommentar - jag godkänner när jag har läst den! Om den är värd att godkännas :)