söndag 11 juni 2017

UNRWA - och Sverige.

>1) UNRWA använder falska foton från Syrien för att anklaga Israel och attackera Israel.
https://unitedwithisrael.org/unrwa-apologizes-for-using-fake-photo-to-attack-israel-over-gaza/


2) https://www.unrwa.org/tags/sweden

Här kan du finna att Sverige ger oändliga donationer till UNRWA. 

3) UNRWA- lärarna består i stort sett av Hamas-medlemmar.

4) I stort sett oändliga mängder  antisemitiskt palestinskt glödande hat mot Israel och judar. 

5) Sverige gav   $ /invån   48000/10000000 =   
     EU       gav                114000 / 743.000.000

lördag 10 juni 2017

Östasiatiska Israelsupporters reser och stöder Israel i Judeen/Samarien.



East Asian supporters of Israel come to Samaria

On 50th anniversary of liberation of Jerusalem, a group of Israel supporters from East Asia visits Samaria.
Contact Editor
Arutz Sheva Staff, 

tisdag 6 juni 2017

Gatestones artiklar på svenska.

https://sv.gatestoneinstitute.org/

måndag 5 juni 2017

Säkerhetsrådets §242: Västbanken inte ockuperad


                                                                                                                                                                             
TTs sagor:  

Israeler: Västbanken inte ockuperad


Säkerhetsrådets §242.

Israel vann ett FÖRSVARSkrig när hela arabvärlden anföll. Sexdagarskriget vanns av Israel,  Större delen av världen bryr sej ändå inte om att Israel vann överlägset, Jämför när England och Frankrike vann över Turkiet/Ottomanska Imperiet efter första världskriget - dock inte ett försvarskrig och dessa två länder styrde och ställde i Mellanöstern, över såväl Palestinska Mandatet, och oändliga ytor som gavs till araber. Internationell LAG bekräftades av både NF och FN, länk

TT flatskrattar åt denna internationella LAG och Säkerhetsrådet. Samma flatskratt dag effter dag.





söndag 4 juni 2017

De lyckade svenskar Expressen är mest avundsjuk på, konstigt nog korrelerar de väldigt väl med EUs definition av antisemitism.

Jag såg den avundsjuka listan först på länk, sedan slog det mej att den väldigt väl korrelerar med länk

En amerikansk motsvarande lista är
 http://www.ranker.com/list/notable-rabbi_s)/reference

En annan välkänd lista med många av "Guds utvalda folk" och som alltså producerar mindervärdeskänsla hos många "vanliga" som tidningsmurvlar utan nåt vettigt att skriva om, är
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates

Judarnas huvudstad sedan tusentals år
Och ska vi se genom årtusenden kan vi titta på https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rabbis
Kommer de avundsjuka typerna på Expressen att arbeta sig igenom alla? Nazisterna gjorde ju det och varför vara mindre grundlig? Anledningen att göra upp en sådan lista - kan du hitta någon mer än identiiskt samma som nazisterna?

Letar du i Googles kan du hitta förstorat Jerusalem I världens centrum, enligt kartan. Detta sedan årtusenden.  Den stad Arafat tiggde världen om utan att ha några som helst rättigheter till, bara ett intensivt "vill ha, vill ha, vill ha" som om han satt i en sandlåda och det värkte nånstans i rumpen.

Det gör en lite ledsen att se att de flesta judar i listan är välkända vänstertyper, som aldrig skulle ha försvarat ett nationalistiskt Israel.  Ännu mer vänster än Netanyahu som valdes av högern, men som släpat in vänsterblöjor som Barak och Livni, Och försökt få in bleknosar som vänsterledaren Herzog som aldrig gjort något som varit bra för Israel, vad jag vet, och vars mest kända meriter är några kända förfäder länk.















Flera tips hur Israel måste vinna. Daniel Pipes.

Varför försöker inte Israel vinna kriget? De ökar krigets lidaande för båda sidor genom att dra ut det i det oändliga. Många exempel.



http://www.danielpipes.org/17503/how-israel-wins
Translations of this item:











lördag 3 juni 2017

Trump - låt Israel vinna!

Här en detaljerad artikel om ämnet. Det omöjliga att få Abbas att ändra på Fatahs Konstitution, som bl.a. säger att



  • Artikel (12) Fullständig befrielse av Palestina, och utrotande av den sionistiska ekonomiska, politiska, militära och kulturella existensen
  • Artikel (19) Väpnad kamp är en strategi och inte en taktik, och det palestinska arabiska folkets väpnade revolution är en avgörande faktor i befrielsekampen att utrota den sionistiska existensen, och denna kamp kommer inte att upphöra innan den sionistiska staten rivs och Palestina är helt befriat.


Article (12) Complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence. 

Article (19) Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic, and the Palestinian Arab People's armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated.

Se: http://www.mythsandfacts.org/conflict/statute-treaties/fateh_constitution.htm

Senaten krävde 2008 att de artiklar som kräver Israels förstörelse ska tas bort. Inget har hänt men Obama gav ändå otroliga summor.   http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110sres499is/xml/BILLS-110sres499is.xml

Abbas har redan gjort Trump rasande, redan inom 24 tmmar hade han brutit sina löften, länk. Dags för handling. som enda väg.

http://www.danielpipes.org/17575/achieving-israel-victory-with-martin-shermanv
by Daniel Pipes
Israel National News
My call for Israel victory has prompted Martin Sherman, executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies, to write a trilogy of serious and constructive critiques (herehere, and here) for Israel National News. This is how an idea is improved, so I thank him.
In response, I shall first recapitulate my thesis, then answer his reservations.
My argument: Nearly thirty years of "peace process" has left Palestinian-Israeli relations worse than when they started; therefore, further attempts (such as those Donald Trump is now initiating) are a fool's errand. Compromise and "painful concessions" do not end conflicts; rather, history shows, one side giving up does so.
Breaking the Palestinian will to fight will be neither easy nor pleasant; but the only alternative is Israel's disappearance. Palestinian acceptance of Israel hollows out anti-Zionism and will eventually prompt other Arabs and Muslims also to move on. Defeat will hugely benefit the Palestinians, who can finally end their destructive focus on the Jewish state and instead begin to build their own polity, economy, society, and culture.
My goal is to convince Washington to let Israel win; once this is achieved, Israelis can work out in detail how to attain this goal. Toward this end, the Middle East Forum, the organization I head, has worked with House members to start a Congressional Israel Victory Caucus to urge the president – this one or a future one – to adopt the Israel victory approach.
In response, Sherman calls the conceptual foundations of my approach "eminently sound" and deems the Congressional caucus a "decidedly welcome and timely" development. Turning then from kudos to caveats, however, he challenges my approach on five grounds:   /klicka länk för att läsa färdigt/




.










torsdag 1 juni 2017

Redan 1989 ville Rabin ha amerikanska ambassaden i Jerusalem.

Har du tänkt på en sak - där finns inte en enda anledning till att araberna skulle ha en portion av judarnas Huvudstad sedan flera tusen år? Den enda anledningen skulle vara Jordaniens illegala ockupation 1946-67, en ockupation utförd med hjälp av England och erkänd av enbart England och Pakistan, länk.

.

'Rabin wanted the embassy in Jerusalem back in 1989'

Dennis Ross reveals that Yitzhak Rabin approached him in 1989 about the possibility of moving the American embassy to Jerusalem.

Contact Editor
Reut Hadar, 


Jewish-American diplomat Dennis Ross, who among his many roles served as former President Barack Obama's Middle East adviser, revealed on Tuesday that already in 1989, then-Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin approached him and asked for preparations to begin to move the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
“In 1989, Rabin asked me to act to move the embassy to Jerusalem,” said Ross at a panel he hosted at the Jewish People Policy Institute in Jerusalem.
“I think we need to prepare the ground and the public opinion around the world for this. The Trump administration realizes that moving the embassy is an emotional issue and should not be done in haste,” he added.
Tuesday’s panel, which dealt with the changes, challenges and dilemmas in the geopolitical arena, was also attended by Elliot Abrams, former deputy national security adviser in the Bush administration, and by General Amos Gilad, who until recently served as the director of the Defense Ministry's Political-Military Affairs Bureau.
Abrams, who is considered close to President Donald Trump, spoke about the potential embassy move as well, saying, “In June we will know what is going on. Moving to Jerusalem is not a simple process. I would like to see steps being made in that direction - finding a location for the embassy, ​​construction and so on. I would be happy if Trump would show that he took some steps in that direction. At the moment it does not seem that something is being done.”
Moving the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in recognition of Jerusalem being Israel’s capital was a central campaign promise of Trump’s.
Despite the campaign promises, however, things seem to have stalled. White House press secretary Sean Spicer recently told reporters that no decision has been made yet on the subject.
Trump himself appeared to back down a bit from his campaign pledge, telling the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) last month that such a move would not be “easy”.
He said a decision on the matter will come “in the not-too-distant future”.
Tuesday’s panel also dealt with the nuclear deal between Iran and world powers, which Trump has heavily criticized, saying it was “the worst deal I’ve ever seen negotiated”.
Abrams opined that “American policy has no tools to act against Iran,” adding that he expects the U.S. administration “to work strongly against Iran on all levels, but not cancel the agreement.”
He said that U.S. policy against Iran should include working to stop it from transferring weapons to and financing terror groups, and to work towards the collapse of the regime “that is among the worst violators of human rights among in the world.”
Gilad said that the real threat in the region is Iran, which continues its acts of subversion, empowers and finance terrorists, and provides them with arms with missiles, particularly Hezbollah.
“ISIS will be defeated this year, but Iran will continue to grow stronger,” opined Gilad. Russia, he added, “will not stop Hezbollah but will not prevent Israel from acting against them. It is important not to take action against any Russian soldier because Russia’s situation in the region is very fragile and delicate.”
Gilad also estimated that Iran will not violate the nuclear agreement.
“It will wait until the end of the agreement, it has patience. It is important to understand the true long-term goal of Iran is the destruction of Israel, and that’s why the security cooperation between the United States and Israel is extremely important and we must work to increase it,” he said.

Målet är fred, inte två stater.



'The goal is to achieve peace, not to establish two states'

Elliot Abrams, a former Special Assistant to President George W. Bush, discusses Donald Trump's policies regarding the Middle East.
Contact Editor
Arutz Sheva Staff, 

Netanyahu and Trump
Netanyahu and Trump
Hezki Baruch
"Donald Trump made a mistake when he objected to my appointment as Deputy Secretary of State. He should have looked at who could help the Trump administration and not looked back at his campaign," said Elliot Abrams in a Walla News interview. Abrams, who was Secretary of State Tillerson's choice for his deputy, was rejected by President Trump. A known Israel supporter, Abrams served in senior posts in the Reagan and Bush administrations and said that Israel had also expressed disappointment that he was not appointed.
Abrams, who is visiting Israel to participate in a Jewish People Policy Institute conference, addressed the president's intentions regarding the Arab-Israel conflict. He said that "I do not believe that Trump's statement about one or two-state solutions means he is abandoning all previous policies in Washington. He meant to say that previous policies had not worked, we're still failing."
"The goal is not two states. The goal is peace," said Abrams. " So let's think of ways to move forward towards peace. The administration wants to involve more Arab countries in the process. I think this is the logical approach but I'm skeptical about its results."
Abrams feels that President Trump should not be involved in efforts to restart the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians but "its obvious that he would want to achieve a breakthrough where Clinton,Bush and Obama failed in the Middle East. This is one of the reasons he involved his son-in-law Jared Kushner in the matter -this is a sign of his commitment."
Abrams advises Kushner to learn from the past and study all the documents and talk with State Department historians as well as former senior American officials and negotiators. He says in this way he can learn why past efforts have failed.
Abrams believes that the administration has returned to the Bush administrations approach which was not concerned by natural growth in Judea and Samaria but did try to prevent territorial expansion. "A few weeks ago the White House used the expression "foothold in the West Bank". I understand this to be a call on Israeli leaders to exercise some restraint, as Bush asked Sharon. The US does not want to see territorial expansion at a time when it is trying to assess whether the peace process can be rejuvenated."
Abrams says he hopes the president will fulfill his promise to move the embassy to Jerusalem but stressed that this is a long process. "A campus must be built including office rooms and a house for the ambassador and all the embassy staff must be transferred from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, so it's a question of finding accommodation. If the move is planned from now it will still take five or six years," said Abrams.

Abbas: Trump ljög

Vilken tror du på, Abbas eller Trump? Wallström får tro vad hon vill. Det berör aldrig någonsin verkligheten.

PA officials: Trump showed Abbas videos of PA incitement

Abbas reportedly claimed that the videos were forged: 'Just ask the CIA.'

Contact EditoTal Polon, 
PA officials confirmed reports in Israel that US President Donald Trump had lambasted PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas during their meeting in Bethlehem over the PA’s involvement in anti-Israel incitement.
On Sunday, Channel 2 reported that the meeting between Trump and Abbas in Bethlehem last week had been anything but cordial.
The report cited a US official present during the meeting who claimed that the president had expressed outrage with Abbas, yelling at him regarding Abbas’ claims that his Fatah faction was not involved in anti-Israel and anti-Semitic incitement.
“You tricked me in Washington,” the president is said to have yelled at Abbas, referencing the PA leader’s March trip to the US capital.
On Wednesday, the London-based Arab news outlet “Al-Araby Al-Jadeed” cited PA officials who confirmed the reports. According to them, Abbas had described his meeting with Trump in Bethlehem as “unpleasant,” and said that Trump had expressed anger towards him, blaming him for incitement against Israel.
According to the report, Trump showed Abbas a number of video clips, including one in which Abbas was seen saying, “We incite, and the Israelis incite.” In response, Abbas had claimed that the videos had been cut, and were being taken out of context.
The PA officials said that Abbas had claimed that Trump’s rage at him was the result Israeli “incitement” against him. “You have methods in the CIA, ask them to analyze the videos, and you’ll find that they were taken out of context or forged in order to incite against the Palestinians,” he reportedly told Trump.
The PA sources described the meeting as having been tense, and said that Abbas had repeatedly exploded in annoyance when his senior advisers asked questions.


Ibland attackerar hon judarna, ibland sina medtävlare. Hur lik är hon EUs övriga höger som SD och Geert Wilders?


Marine LePen: Fundamentalist Islam is a mortal danger

France's Le Pen accuses rival Macron of being soft on Islamists.

AFP,