tisdag 20 september 2016

Tusen och en natt à la Ban, Obama.

Idiotiskt tal av Obama i FN. Jämför med ki-Moons. Bägge berättade hur bra de var, bägge talade om ett helt okänt land, "palestina" : hade man frågat när det uppstod hade de inte haft en aning. eftersom det aldrig skett, Abbas och Arafat vägrade förhandla fram fred och stod helt fast vid Fatahs näst senaste stadgar, de sista sade kort att vad som sades i de näst senaste fortfarande gällde mycket tydligt

Artikel (12) Fullständig befrielse av Palestina, och utrotande av den sionistiska ekonomiska, politiska, militära och kulturella existensen.
Artikel (19) Väpnad kamp är en strategi och inte en taktik, och det palestinska arabiska folkets väpnade revolution är en avgörande faktor i befrielsekampen att utrota den sionistiska existensen, och denna kamp kommer inte att upphöra innan den sionistiska staten rivs och Palestina är helt befriat.
Article (12) Complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence.
Article (19) Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic, and the Palestinian Arab People's armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated.

Vad Obama skulle bli överraskad att höra det!

Israels ambassadör Danon gav förklaring; http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/218077

Israeli Ambassador Danon blasts UN 'obsession with Israel'

After UN Secretary-General says 50 years of 'occupation' is 'madness', Ambassador Danon says the UN 'obsession' with Israel must end.

Shai Landesman, 20/09/16 17:56

Danny Danon and Ban Ki-moon

Shahar Ezran

Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon reacted harshly to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s opening address at the UN General Assembly. The Secretary-General decided to take the opportunity to criticize Israel, saying: “Ten years of illegal settlement expansion and fifty years of occupation. This is madness. The Palestinians cannot continue to live under Israeli occupation.”
Ambassador Danon reacted by saying that “The real madness belongs to the UN. Instead of focusing on Palestinian terror and incitement, and instead of compelling [Palestinian Authority President] Mahmoud Abbas to return to the negotiating table, the Secretary-General chose to criticize Israel once again. This is an obsession with Israel and it must end.”
“At a time when Palestinian terror is on the rise in Israel, the Secretary-General chose to criticize us and ignore the direct responsibility of Abbas and the Palestinian leadership who continue to incite towards terror.”
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has repeatedly said in every opportunity he gets that he is willing to meet with Abbas "anytime, anywhere" to discuss peace. Abbas, for his part, refuses to meet for negotiations unless certain "preconditions" are met, namely, that Israel makes concessions before negotiations even begin.
Secretary-General Ban, apparently, still chooses to focus on the "occupation" and "settlements" as the perceived main source of the problem.

†FN †Antisemitism †Israel . .........

Trump och Judarna.

Trump har i svenska offentliga massmedia drabbats av samma vinkling som i amerikanska demokratiska media, d.v.s. total support av Obama/Hillarys vansinnespåhitt som deras nya religion upp till att starta kärnvapenkrig genom att överösa Iran med dollars. Medbloggaren på http://mxp.blogg.se/2016/august/trump-video-varje-jude-maste-se-2.html visar YouTubevideon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2G9MR1n7Es

Vänsterns uppfattning.

Alla som är förpestade av TTs vänstervinkling av verkligheten lär få en chock av dessa fakta. att de är triviala fakta kan de inte förneka, bara försöka tysta ner som TT och deras efterapningar.

Den minst sagt komplicerade uppfattningen är av många amerikanska judars support av Israelhataren Obama vars ideer i

ämnet delas av Hillary. Därför sägs på videon att den måste ses av varje jude. Jag tror alla måste se den vare sej de känner något om "jude" eller inte. Jag är vanlig svensk som inte visste något om judar före mitt första av många besök i Israel i början av 7o-talet. Att jag fick mycket fler vänner där än i Sverige är bara ett faktum.

Att jag mer och mer insett att den västerländska kulturen är helt judeokristen är jag inte ensam om, att en del kristna har försökt ersätta sitt judiska ursprung med total vilsenhet ser vi, med svenska präster som försöker avlägsna judiska symboler i kyrkorna.

Vilket påminner om en story: en gammal jude förirrade sej in i en kyrka, prelaten blev mäkta förargad och bad honom avlägsna sej, han hade inget att göra där. Juden tittade upp, gick långsamt fram till predikstolen, tittade upp på Jesusbilden, tog ner den och sa: "vi är inte välkomna här".

.

†Trump †Antisemitism †Israel . .........

torsdag 15 september 2016

Svenska och europeiska kvinnor attackerar¨Israel.

Jämför med de enorma leveranserna från Israel, http://www.cogat.idf.il/894-en/Matpash.aspx
inser man att showen från några vänsterfruntimmer i EU är helt meningslös vad gäller leveranser till Gaza.

Women's flotilla sets sail for Gaza

new women’s flotilla aimed at violating the Israeli naval blockade on Gaza left on Wednesday from the Spanish city of Barcelona,Al Jazeera reported.

Two sailing boats, Amal and Zaytouna, with 11 women on board each, sailed off under the banner "The Women's Boat to Gaza", according to the report.

The passengers include Swedish European Parliament Member Malin Bjork and Dr Fouzia Hassan of Malaysia. They aim to reach Gaza by early October.

"We are carrying food and medicine on the boat that will be distributed to Gazans upon arrival," Zohar Chamberlain Regev, a spokeswoman of the initiative, told Al Jazeera.

"But mainly we are carrying a message of hope and solidarity, because we think Gazans want that most of all."

She said she had high hopes that the flotilla would not be stopped by the Israeli navy and reach the destination.

"We know that we are not a threat to Israel. We are not heading to an Israeli port so they have no reason to stop us," she told Al Jazeera.

Last time the Women's Boat to Gaza attempted to enter Gaza in 2015, the Israeli navy boarded and took over its vessel, Marianne. The boat was taken to the Israeli city of Ashdod to have its contents inspected.

The women’s initiative is one of several recent attempts to break Israel's naval blockade on Gaza, which a UN team has said is completely legal.

The first, and perhaps most famous flotilla, was the 2010 Mavi Marmara flotilla. When the ships taking part refused to stop IDF soldiers boarded, upon which they were assaulted by the "humanitarian" activists wielding knives, iron bars and other lethal weapons.

The soldiers were forced to open fire to save their lives, killing ten of their assailants and sparking an international media backlash.

Despite the supposed "humanitarian" aims of the effort, Israel found the flotilla in fact was not carrying any humanitarian aid, or any other type of supplies for that matter.

†Gaza †Antisemitism †Israel . .........

lördag 10 september 2016

Terror europeisk sjukdom.

Europeisk politisk fantasi har gjort alla terrorister sjuka.

‘They’re All Crazy!’ — The Language We Use When Reporting on Terror Attacks

August 31, 2016 2:13

Author: Ron Jontof-Hutter

“But I don’t want to go among mad people, Alice remarked.
Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat. “We’re all mad here.” — Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland.

It has become fashionable to invoke the M’Naghten rules as soon as there is a terrorist attack in Europe. Typically, the perpetrator shouts “Allahu Akhbar” and murders innocent bystanders at some restaurant, bus stop, theater, night club or what have you. Authorities quickly follow up by darkly muttering that the terrorist was actually a person with mental-health issues. Their job is to convince the public how to engage in denial.
Whereas Freud explained 100 years ago how defense mechanisms such as denial, projection and rationalization affected human behavior, today we embrace these concepts as an integral and essential part of political correctness. For instance, politicians have suddenly become theologians and experts in comparative religion by stating that shouting “Allahu Akhbar” has nothing to do with the real Islam. Security officials, backed up by government ministers, on the other hand, suddenly transform into psychologists and psychiatrists, becoming mental-health experts. It’s a new form of multitasking.
The M’Naghten rules were formulated in 1843, after Daniel M’Naghten was acquitted of the charge of murdering Edward Drummond, whom he had mistaken for British Prime Minister Robert Peel. He had believed that Mr. Peel was conspiring against him. The court found him not guilty by “reason of insanity,” which resulted in a public outcry to the extent that Queen Victoria intervened and recommended stricter criteria for insanity.

Unlike today’s government spokespeople and security officials, the courts continue to grapple with complicated insanity issues in criminal matters, despite the input of expert mental-health witnesses.
Of course, labeling each Islamist attack as a mental-health issue could be counterproductive.
Anyone walking along a major boulevard in Berlin or elsewhere would notice a fair amount of homeless people begging or bedding down for the night. Many of them would have mental-health issues, yet people walk past them without the slightest concern, let alone fear. Heaven forbid, however, if one of these beggars were to shout “Allahu Ahkbar.” Yes, these two words would be a game changer. If the beggar actually attacked a passerby, he or she would be labeled a criminal. Likewise, a person who stabs or mugs someone in a park or at a bus stop is considered a criminal. But when he shouts the magic words while doing such things, his is a mental-health case. He, like all people yelling the word couplet, is routinely referred to as someone who “became radicalized,” as though he contracted some disease. Hence, diminished responsibility.

From the terrorist’s — or, in PC language, the “patient’s” — point of view, the danger is that, by being called mentally ill, he is being robbed by society of his thunder. After all, ascending to Paradise as a psychiatric patient rather than a martyr would certainly spoil the party. Welcoming virgins would also feel cheated and, worse still, could find themselves in an abusive relationship.
Despite this knee-jerk response to terrorists, the German government is formulating a plan for citizens to equip themselves with a 10-day stock of food and supplies, to be prepared for a potential natural disaster or armed attack. People with “mental-health problems” have thus become a national-security issue. Street beggars must be shaking their heads in dismay as they get overlooked. They might also wonder where, exactly, they should store their 10 days’ worth of emergency supplies. Whatever. They have every reason to hold a grudge.
Since security forces and terrorists are involved in a cat-and-mouse game of one-upmanship, authorities may be put on the defensive if terror groups start calling themselves the Al Neurosa Front, the Psychosis Caliphate or the Front for the Liberation of Acquired Organic Brain Disorder.

If that, heaven forbid, occurs, security officials will be outmaneuvered and certainly out-diagnosed. And the M’Naghten rules will no longer apply. EU officials in Brussels will have to come up with a new, creative solution. They have already regulated the use of rubber gloves in kitchens; mandated the permissible shape of bananas and cucumbers; prohibited the “false” advertisement of water as a cure for dehydration; and made it illegal for prunes to be promoted as a fruit that assists bowel function. Creative thinking is certainly one of their strong points.

There is one country, however — which has had its fair share of attacks — in which terrorists are not automatically diagnosed as having mental-health issues. This country is Israel. And interestingly, European — and increasingly American — theologians and mental-health experts are either silent in relation to terrorism in the Jewish state, or attribute it to — you guessed it — the “occupation.”
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean — nothing more nor less.” Indeed.

Ron Jontof-Hutter is a Fellow at the Berlin International Centre for the Study of Antisemitism. http://www.algemeiner.com/2016/08/31/theyre-all-crazy-the-language-we-use-when-reporting-on-terror-attacks/

†terrorister †Antisemitism †Israel . .........

fredag 9 september 2016

Obama litar inte på Erdogan-

Han flyttar sitt kärnvapenlager från Turkiet till Rumänien. Snart bara Merkel och EU som litar på Erdogan.
http://www.debka.com/article/25613/

Varför exploderade en israelisk satellit vid start?

Olika anledningar för explosionen: sabotage, fågel, okänt objekt?

Was Israel’s satellite sabotaged on US rocket pad?

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report September 3, 2016, 7:53 PM (IDT)

Tags: Amos 6, Cape Canaveral, SpaceX, Falcon 9 rocket, US, Israeli satellite, Israel, China,

This video is currently unavailable. Please try back again later.

A day after Israel’s Amos-6 communications satellite was lost in a highly unusual explosion/fast fire of the SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and its Amos 6 satellite payload at Cape Canaveral, some Israel aerospace industry experts are beginning to suspect sabotage. They are keeping their suspicions to themselves pending an investigation in which NASA ad the US Air Force will be taking part.
An explosion or fire occurring during a standard pre-launch static test prior to the engine igniting may be unique. These Israeli experts can’t recall any space satellite disasters happening at that particular stage.
Immediately after the event, SpaceX founder Elon Musk said an “anomaly happened around the upper-stage oxygen tank wile propellant was being loaded into the vehicle.”
Two days later, Saturday, Sept. 3, Musk attributed the loss to a “fast fire” rather than an explosion.
Representatives of Spacecom owned by Israeli Eurocom and Israeli Aerospace Industry, which manufactured Amos 6, their largest satellite to date, don’t expect to be invited to take part in the investigation.
Those circles resent Elon Musk’s reference to an “anomaly,” which they see as a euphemism to disguise the cause of the mishap.
American experts are speculating about a large, black. unidentified object picked up by video footage hovering in the sky at the moment the fireball rose over the Cape Canaveral launching pad.
Some are suggesting it was a large bird which happened to be flying past; others say the object is much too big and too fast for any known bird.
In Israel, some informed sources suggest that the reason for the Amos 6 satellites destruction is far from technical and may never come to light.
They cite the only previous SpaceX failure, which occurred in June, 2015, when a Falcon 9 rocket carrying supplies to the International Space Station exploded just a few minutes after launch. The company set up an inquiry team composed of 11 staff members and one FAA official, but never released details of its findings.
Three causes for the Amos 6 loss are postulated by Israeli sources:

1. The stiff competition among the companies of the eight nations that manufacture satellites. The last in the Amos series of communications satellites, produced at a cost of $200 million, was the most sophisticated produced so far. Some international competitor may have decided to push Israel out of the contest by destroying its newest product. This has indeed set Israel’s satellite industry back for years.

2. The other motive may be connected with the fact that Amos 6 was to have been Facebook’s first satellite. CEO Mark Zuckerberg had announced that Amos 6, scheduled for launch into geostationary orbit on Sept. 3, would have opened large parts of sub-Saharan Africa to direct internet.
Its loss has forced Zuckerberg to put his plan on hold.
This plan went well with the largely covert Israel drive in the last three years to expand its ties across the Africa. The Facebook project fitted in well this policy an added dimension and spurt.

3. Spacom had just signed a $285 sale contract with Beijing Xinwei Technology that was contingent on its successful launch into orbit of Amos 6 Saturday. One of Israel’s competitors may have been after the Chinese contract.

†Israelisk satellit †Antisemitism †Israel . .........

Hur skilja Muhammed från Muhammad?

Call him Mohammed

Mohammed is the most popular boys’ name in Europe.

Giulio Meotti, 09/09/16 10:32

Giulio Meotti

The writer, an Italian journalist with Il Foglio, writes a twice-weekly column for Arutz Sheva. He is the author of the book "A New Shoah", that researched the personal stories of Israel's terror victims, published by Encounter and of "J'Accuse: the Vatican Against Israel" published by Mantua Books.. His writing has appeared in publications, such as the Wall Street Journal, Frontpage and Commentary.

torsdag 8 september 2016

Jag säger inte nej bara för att jag avskyr Hillary.

Hillary gav allt till Iran.

I'm not just saying 'no' to Hillary Clinton

Trump gives me hope.

Naomi Ragen, 08/09/16 10:29

Naomi Ragen

The writer is a best-selling American-born novelist, playwright and journalist who has lived in Jerusalem since 1971.

torsdag 1 september 2016

Atombomb i år.

Iran could have an operational nuke by 2017 end

DEBKAfile Special Expose August 6, 2016, 11:34 AM (IDT)

Tags: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Iran, Iran nuclear, Iran nuclear deal, Iran-Israel, Iranian ballistic missiles, Israel, Binyamin Netanyahu,

The nuclear accord signed a year ago with Iran has become a hot US presidential campaign issue. On Thursday, Aug. 4, US President Barack Obama speaking at the Pentagon said the agreement “has worked exactly the way we said it would,” and even “Israeli defense officials are behind [it]… and now recognize the efficacy of the accord” and that the Iranians “no longer have the short term breakout capacity that would allow them to develop nuclear weapons.”
Hillary Clinton declared at the Democratic Party convention which gave her the presidential nomination: “We put a lid on Iran’s nuclear program without firing a single shot.”
Both these claims may be called hyperbolic at best and drew a response from Tel Aviv:

“The Israeli defense establishment believes that agreements have value only if they are based on reality. They have no value if the facts on the ground are opposite to the ones the agreement is based on.”
Documents reachingDEBKAfile’s intelligence sources in recent weeks bare some facts contained in unpublished sections of the nuclear accord – Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) - that Iran signed in Vienna with the US, China, France, Russia, retain and Germany on July 14 2015.
This data is at odds with the official version that accord delayed Iran’s short-term breakout capacity to a nuclear bomb by ten years plus one year. It is now demonstrated that if Tehran decides to violate the accord Iran retains the capability to achieve this goal in months - not years.
The strongest confirmation of this fact comes from the horse’s mouth: Ali Akbar Salehi, President of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, has said the nuclear deal stipulates that if any party violates it, then Iran can go back to enriching uranium at Natanz within 45 days at an even higher capacity than before the agreement was signed - – his deputy cited twenty-fold.
Their words followed supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s repeated allegations that the US is in violation of the JCPA.
US administration officials’ insistence that Iran will need a whole year to attain breakout capacity of its nuclear weapons program at the end of the 10-year moratorium is nullified by three covert Iranian steps:

1. Iran has concealed from International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors entire clusters of second-generation IR-2m centrifuges – some by upgrading IR machines at home and some imported from Pakistan and Germany. These hidden machines can substantially cut short the process of enriching uranium at the Natanz and Fordo plants up to weapons-grade.

2. Before signing the nuclear accord, Tehran stock-piled in Natanz alone 15,420 centrifuges – 9,156 of the first-generation IR-1 version and 1,000 high-speed IR-2m enrichment machines. On the date of signing, the inspectors were shown 5,060 IR-1 centrifuges – all dismantled and stowed away in storage along with the relevant feed equipment such as pipes, cooling systems and electronics.
That Iran is now in a position to reassemble its enrichment facilities within 45 days was admitted by Salehi himself.

3. The American calculation of the time Iran would need to build a nuclear bomb was based on the quantity of low-grade enriched uranium (LEU) left with Iran for further refinement to weapon-grade level. Washington was satisfied that Tehran abided by the 300 kilograms limit set by the accord.

However, Iran has since been revealed as cheating on that provision too by transferring a much larger LEU stock to Oman and continuing to clandestinely turn out further quantities disguised as materials required for “research.”

All this information adds up to Iran’s current ability to flout the JCPA at any time, having retained all its capabilities and means of production for breaking out to developing a nuclear weapon within months, up to the end of 2017 – rather than years. After marking strides in their missile program, the Iranians would also soon be able to mount a nuke on an intercontinental ballistic missile, which could wipe out a European or Middle East city.

†Iran †Antisemitism †Israel . .........

Iran lurar alla - kärnvapen slutet av 2017.

Iran could have an operational nuke by 2017 end DEBKAfile Special Expose August 6, 2016, 11:34 AM (IDT)
The nuclear accord signed a year ago with Iran has become a hot US presidential campaign issue. On Thursday, Aug. 4, US President Barack Obama speaking at the Pentagon said the agreement “has worked exactly the way we said it would,” and even “Israeli defense officials are behind [it]… and now recognize the efficacy of the accord” and that the Iranians “no longer have the short term breakout capacity that would allow them to develop nuclear weapons.”
Hillary Clinton declared at the Democratic Party convention which gave her the presidential nomination: “We put a lid on Iran’s nuclear program without firing a single shot.”
Both these claims may be called hyperbolic at best and drew a response from Tel Aviv:
“The Israeli defense establishment believes that agreements have value only if they are based on reality. They have no value if the facts on the ground are opposite to the ones the agreement is based on.”
Documents reaching DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources in recent weeks bare some facts contained in unpublished sections of the nuclear accord – Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) - that Iran signed in Vienna with the US, China, France, Russia, retain and Germany on July 14 2015.
This data is at odds with the official version that accord delayed Iran’s short-term breakout capacity to a nuclear bomb by ten years plus one year. It is now demonstrated that if Tehran decides to violate the accord Iran retains the capability to achieve this goal in months - not years.
The strongest confirmation of this fact comes from the horse’s mouth: Ali Akbar Salehi, President of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, has said the nuclear deal stipulates that if any party violates it, then Iran can go back to enriching uranium at Natanz within 45 days at an even higher capacity than before the agreement was signed - – his deputy cited twenty-fold.
Their words followed supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s repeated allegations that the US is in violation of the JCPA.
US administration officials’ insistence that Iran will need a whole year to attain breakout capacity of its nuclear weapons program at the end of the 10-year moratorium is nullified by three covert Iranian steps:
1. Iran has concealed from International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors entire clusters of second-generation IR-2m centrifuges – some by upgrading IR machines at home and some imported from Pakistan and Germany. These hidden machines can substantially cut short the process of enriching uranium at the Natanz and Fordo plants up to weapons-grade.
2. Before signing the nuclear accord, Tehran stock-piled in Natanz alone 15,420 centrifuges – 9,156 of the first-generation IR-1 version and 1,000 high-speed IR-2m enrichment machines. On the date of signing, the inspectors were shown 5,060 IR-1 centrifuges – all dismantled and stowed away in storage along with the relevant feed equipment such as pipes, cooling systems and electronics.
That Iran is now in a position to reassemble its enrichment facilities within 45 days was admitted by Salehi himself.
3. The American calculation of the time Iran would need to build a nuclear bomb was based on the quantity of low-grade enriched uranium (LEU) left with Iran for further refinement to weapon-grade level. Washington was satisfied that Tehran abided by the 300 kilograms limit set by the accord.
However, Iran has since been revealed as cheating on that provision too by transferring a much larger LEU stock to Oman and continuing to clandestinely turn out further quantities disguised as materials required for “research.”
All this information adds up to Iran’s current ability to flout the JCPA at any time, having retained all its capabilities and means of production for breaking out to developing a nuclear weapon within months, up to the end of 2017 – rather than years. After marking strides in their missile program, the Iranians would also soon be able to mount a nuke on an intercontinental ballistic missile, which could wipe out a European or Middle East city.

†Indien †Kina †Bennett †Antisemitism †Israel . .........

Prenumerera på: Inlägg ( Atom )

Israel i Sverige[B]